Verify the composite plan
Cross-check the court surveyor’s composite plan against the original plans filed by the parties, including coordinates, bearings, distances, scale, orientation, acreage and relative position.
DiKnow TechnologiesUK / GhanaLaw • Land • Expert Evidence • C.I. 47
SPV can help counsel test the technical reliability of a court-ordered composite plan, prepare focused cross-examination and explain material spatial discrepancies through independent expert evidence.
High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules, 2004
A court-ordered composite plan may influence findings about identity, location, boundaries, dimensions, acreage and overlap. Independent verification helps ensure that the technical evidence is properly tested before reliance at trial.
Cross-check the court surveyor’s composite plan against the original plans filed by the parties, including coordinates, bearings, distances, scale, orientation, acreage and relative position.
Where material errors or omissions are identified, counsel may consider an application under Order 26 rule 2(2) for a further or supplementary report and, where necessary, correction or redrawing.
Use the SPV findings to formulate technical questions about source plans, coordinates, plotting procedure, scale, datum, grid or CRS, measurements and conclusions. The attached brief notes the fourteen-day timing under rule 4(1).
Where matters remain unclear, counsel may consider reasonable notice under Order 26 rule 6(1) and call one suitably qualified expert on matters reported upon by the court expert.
Professional briefings
The attached briefings summarise potential applications and reported practical impact. Select either image to open the full-resolution poster.


For current enquiries, use the telephone numbers and email addresses shown on this website.
Independent Composite Plan Analysis
Whether the court composite accurately reflects the plans, coordinates, scale, orientation and parcel information filed by the parties.
Omitted parcels, positional shifts, inaccurate acreage, coordinate-entry errors, incorrect overlaps and plotting or transformation inconsistencies.
The mapped relationship between competing parcels, alleged overlap areas, surrounding features and the composite plan.
Maps, measurements, tables and reproducible analysis that can assist counsel, experts and the Court to understand the technical issues.
Practical impact
SPV has been used in court proceedings to identify material technical issues and support an order for a court-appointed surveyor to redo a composite plan. Party-appointed experts have also presented SPV Composite Plan Analysis Reports and clarified spatial matters under cross-examination.
SPV provides independent spatial analysis and decision-support evidence. It does not by itself authenticate legal title, determine ownership or replace official land searches, licensed field surveys, legal advice, or decisions of the relevant authorities and courts.